WATCH LIVE: Zimbabwe Generals Back Chiwenga Presidency

History repeats: A principled man steps aside for a leader, only to be betrayed by that same leader once in power.

Kenya (1960s):

• British offered Jaramogi Oginga Odinga the presidency before independence.

• He refused, insisting Jomo Kenyatta be released from detention to lead instead.

• Kenyatta became president, then marginalised and persecuted Odinga.

• Later, Kenyatta’s son (Uhuru) also blocked Odinga’s son (Raila) from the presidency.

Zimbabwe (2017):

• During Mugabe’s fall, General Chiwenga was offered the presidency by Mugabe.

• He declined, saying it was “Mnangagwa’s time” and to “follow the hierarchy.”

• Mnangagwa became president, then sidelined and diminished Chiwenga.

Key difference:

• Odinga was a civilian with limited recourse after betrayal.

• Chiwenga is a general with institutional power, military authority, and the ability to act.

Conclusion:

• Odinga deserved the presidency but was denied it.

• Chiwenga deserves the presidency because he showed restraint, principle, and loyalty – qualities Zimbabwe now needs in a leader.