- Reports suggesting that VP Chiwenga confronted the President emerge from the same speculative theorists who have perpetuated narratives of attrition in the Presidium since 2017. It’s a binary script borne in the wake of the demise of the real opposition. It’s a vacuum-filler!
2. It would be judicious for the upper echelons of leadership to approach such matters in a fashion that promotes harmony and solidarity within the party. Matters of corruption are not novel; they have been the subject of widespread lamentation, calling for decisive action.
3. A flourishing democratic organization draws vitality from the richness of diverse perspectives. It’s the manner in which differing views are engaged that dictates advancement. Notably, the Vice President had his views and was accorded the opportunity to express them.
4. This is befitting within a democratic ethos. Indeed, the President deserves commendation for providing a platform for diverse opinions to be voiced. Nevertheless, it is concerning for the party to find itself embroiled in a situation where members openly vilify one another.
5. It is noteworthy how ZANU PF continues to invite us as traditional leaders to its various events, affording us recognition and respect. Unfortunately, the opposition has failed to latch onto that chance and seldom if ever invites traditional leaders to its events.
6. This is bad politics as you can’t ignore us as traditional leaders. Unfortunately they end up accusing us of being ZANU PF when we are merely invited there. Traditional leaders are the community fathers which is why the Constitution dictates that we should be non-partisan.
7. Consequently, the party must exercise self-regulation and address these issues in a manner that transcends mere sensationalism or the fueling of speculative journalism, which could obscure critical steps to national progress.
