Gambakwe Media has scored the debate held between Prof. Jonathan Moyo and Dr Mavedzenge as 3 points to 10 points based on the following:
- Dr Mavedzenge was factual and stuck to the facts
- Prof Moyo relied on opinions and dismissed case law.
- Dr Mavedzenge only spoke for a short time but covered all points
- Prof Moyo was aggressive and stopped Dr Mavedzenge from speaking
Key Points
Dr Mavedzenge
1. A term length is part of the term limit
2. A term limit can not be changed without a referendum
3. The issue of term limits is settled
4. A recent survey has shown that Zimbabweans don’t want a change of system
5. Any change can not benefit the incumbent
6. Mapungu and Mawarire judgenents have closed the issue
Prof Jonathan Moyo Points
1. 5 years is too short and Zimbabwe is in a state of constant toxicity. 7 years is a standard in Africa.
2. A referendum is not necessary as the constitution does not require it
3. A term length is not a term limit and there is no disqualifier in section 95
4. The Max Mapungu judgement was not about term limit
5. Its not true that a president can only serve for 10 years
6. Moyo has a right to support Mnangagwa on a position where he is correct regardless of what he has said in thee past
7. Moyo denies that he drafted the bill
Unanswered Questions
1. Incumbent -What will happen when the bill is passed. Whatwill happen to Mnangagwa?
2. Is a Referendum not necessary
3. Are you returning to Zimbabwe?
